Site icon ONvegetables

Fungicide Efficacy Summary Tables for Management of Diseases in Field Tomatoes

Advanced anthracnose lesion on tomato fruit

By: Dr. Cheryl Trueman, Ridgetown Campus – University of Guelph

About these tables:

Late blight:

Anthracnose (fruit rot):

Trade Name* Active Ingredient(s) FRAC Group(s) # of Trials Rating**
Various Mancozeb M3 1 +++
Various Chlorothalonil M5 5 +++
Inspire Difenoconazole 3 3 +
Bravo Top Difenoconazole + chlorothalonil 3 + M5 3 +++
Lance / Cantus WDG Boscalid 7 3 0
Aprovia Benzovindiflupyr 7 2 +++
Sercadis Fluxapyroxad 7 2 ++
Fontelis Penthiopyrad 7 3 +++
Reason Fenamidone 11 1 0
Cabrio Pyraclostrobin 11 3 +++
Quadris Azoxystrobin 11 4 +++
Quadris Top Azoxystrobin + difenoconazole 11 + 3 3 +++

* Not all products may be registered for this crop-disease combination. Always check product labels before use. **0 (no effect) no difference from control plots that receive no fungicide; + (poor) inconsistent control and/or some effect at reducing; ++ (OK to good) consistent control, does not perform as well as +++ products in all years; +++ (very good) consistent control, consistently one of the best fungicides in the trial.

Early blight:

Trade Name* Active Ingredient(s) FRAC Group(s) # of Trials Rating**
Cueva Copper octonoate M1 2 0
Various Mancozeb M3 2 +
Various Chlorothalonil (3.2 L/Ha) M5 2 ++ to +++
Chlorothalonil (2.4 L/Ha) M5 1 +++
Inspire Difenoconazole 3 1 ++
Lance / Cantus WDG Boscalid 7 1 +++
Sercadis Fluxapyroxad 7 2 + to +++
Fontelis Penthiopyrad 7 3 ++ to +++
Luna Privilege Fluopyram 7 1 +++
Aprovia Top Benzovindiflupyr + difenoconazole 7 + 3 2 +++
Miravis Duo Pydiflumetofen (‘Adepidyn’) + difenoconazole 7 + 3 1 +++
Scala SC Pyrimethanil 9 1 ++
Reason 500 SC Fenamidone 11 1 ++
Cabrio EG Pyraclostrobin 11 1 ++
Quadris Azoxystrobin 11 3 +++
Quadris Top Azoxystrobin + difenoconazole 11 + 3 1 +++
Tanos 50 DF Famoxadone + cymoxanil 11 + 27 2 ++ to +++
Phostrol Mono- and di-potassium salts of phosphorous acid 33 2 0
Phostrol + Cueva Mono- and di-potassium salts of phosphorous acid + copper octonoate 33 + M1 1 0
Phostrol + Bravo ZN Mono- and di-potassium salts of phosphorous acid + chlorothalonil (2.4 L/Ha) 33 + M5 2 +++

*Not all products may be registered for this crop-disease combination. Always check product labels before use. **0 (no effect) no difference from control plots that receive no fungicide; + (poor) inconsistent control and/or some effect at reducing; ++ (OK to good) consistent control, does not perform as well as +++ products in all years; +++ (very good) consistent control, consistently one of the best fungicides in the trial.

Septoria leaf spot:

Trade Name* Active Ingredient(s) FRAC Group(s) # of Trials Rating**
Cueva Copper octonoate M1 2 0
Various Mancozeb M3 2 +
Various Chlorothalonil (3.2 L/Ha) M5 3 ++ to +++
Chlorothalonil (2.4 L/Ha) M5 1 +++
Bravo Top Chlorothalonil + difenoconazole M5 + 3 1 +++
Aprovia Benzovindiflupyr 7 1 +++
Sercadis Fluxapyroxad 7 3 ++ to +++
Fontelis Penthiopyrad 7 3 +++
Luna Privilege Fluopyram 7 1 +++
Aprovia TOP Benzovindiflupyr + difenoconazole 7 + 3 2 +++
Miravis Duo Pydiflumetofen (‘Adepidyn’) + difenoconazole 7 + 3 1 +++
Quadris Azoxystrobin 11 3 +++
Quadris Top Azoxystrobin + difenoconazole 11 + 3 1 +++
Tanos Famoxadone + cymoxanil 11 + 27 2 ++ to +++
Phostrol Mono- and di-potassium salts of phosphorous acid 33 2 0
Phostrol + Cueva Mono- and di-potassium salts of phosphorous acid + copper octonoate 33 + M1 1 0
Phostrol + Bravo ZN Mono- and di-potassium salts of phosphorous acid + chlorothalonil (2.4 L/Ha) 33 + M5 2 +++

** Not all products may be registered for this crop-disease combination. Always check product labels before use. **0 (no effect) no difference from control plots that receive no fungicide; + (poor) inconsistent control and/or some effect at reducing; ++ (OK to good) consistent control, does not perform as well as +++ products in all years; +++ (very good) consistent control, consistently one of the best fungicides in the trial.

Interested in a product not on the list?

If you didn’t find the product information you were looking for, check out the fungicide efficacy ratings from other locations:, New York (late blight), New York (late blight, early blight).

Keep in mind that the efficacy ratings linked above are US sources and not all of the products are registered in Canada, or registered on late blight of field tomato. For information on registered tomato fungicides for Ontario, see OMAFRA’s Vegetable Crop Protection Guide.  Always read and understand the label before using any crop protection product.

Exit mobile version