Jump to: 2015 Tomato Nematode Survey Notice
Spring is a good time to sample horticultural fields for plant parasitic nematodes. Nematode counts in the spring are lower than in the fall, but existing nematode thresholds are based on spring sampling.
If you’ve ever sampled for nematodes in soil, you’ve probably (hopefully!) read the guidelines for sampling and handling of samples. But what if things don’t go according to plan and they didn’t get refrigerated right away or the person you gave the sampling job to didn’t quite follow your instructions? Are the samples ruined? What can you get away with and what will result in completely inaccurate results? When you’ve gone to the trouble of sampling and are about to invest in paying a lab for nematode counts, this is something you need to know.
OMAFRA specialists tested some scenarios a few years ago to look at some of the ways nematode samples can go wrong and find out what impact to expect.
Four sites that were in a processing tomato rotation and were known to be infested with plant parasitic nematodes were selected. The recommended sampling and handling treatment was based on OMAFRA Factsheet 06-099, Sampling Soil and Roots for Plant Parasitic Nematodes and discussions with experienced laboratory personnel. Treatments followed the recommended protocols, except for the differences listed.
Recommended nematode soil sampling protocol – key points:
- Sample approximately 8” deep, and discard the top 1-2” of the soil core.
- For row crops, sample in the row, so that samples contain feeder roots.
- Take 10-20 soil cores per acre. Ideally each sample should represent no more than about 6 acres.
- Mix the soil cores thoroughly, but gently. Take a subsample of about 1 litre of soil for shipment to the lab.
- Place soil samples in a cooler with ice. Keep cool (not frozen) until delivery. Samples should not be subjected to sudden temperature changes.
- Deliver samples to the lab as soon as possible — no longer than 3-4 days.
Part 1 of this article will focus on the impacts of sampling. See part 2 for what we found when we handled the samples improperly.
- Recommended protocol. Stored in cooler or refrigerator. Delivered to lab within 1 day.
- Recommended protocol, except sample depth of 0-6” instead of 2-8”. Delivered to lab within 1 day.
- Recommended protocol except soil cores not broken up or mixed before taking subsample out for lab. Delivered to lab within 1 day.
- Recommended protocol except sampled within a ½ acre square instead of a full 6 acre area. Delivered to lab within 1 day.
Results are shown as percentages, where the average count (4 sites) from the recommended protocol is shown as 100% and the average count (4 sites) of each treatment is shown as a percent of that “ideal” count.
We would have expected lower nematode numbers when sampling the 0-6” depth compared to the 2-8” depth, but that didn’t hold true for all species in these samples. At the time of sampling, the top layer of soil had not become extremely hot and dry, so it could have still supported some nematodes. Nevertheless, established nematode thresholds are based on sampling to 8”, but removing the top 1-2”. Also, to compare nematodes counts over time, it is important to be consistent in your sampling. Consistency in depth, sampling locations in the field, time of year, and laboratory are all important. And of course use consistently proper handling, as we will see in part 2 of this article.
Nematode populations are notoriously variable across a field, even in the distance between two plants. When you consider that some soil cores might contain no nematodes and some might be crawling with hundreds of them, it becomes clear that thorough mixing of the soil cores before taking out the sample for the lab is very important! You can actually kill nematodes with overly vigourous mixing, they tell me, so gentle (but thorough) mixing is recommended. It is amazing to me that nematodes would be so easy to kill once you get them in a pail! In the test, you can see that we got very different results from grabbing a sample without mixing, compared to the same sample after thorough mixing.
In the final treatment, we simulated grid sampling (taking sample from within a half acre square) compared to taking a sample from across approximately six acres, the maximum recommended area to include in one sample. The differences we found seem small, but this is after averaging four sites. When we look at individual sites, we see differences like this (using root lesion nematode as an example):
Not all crops will support the expense of detailed grid sampling for nematodes, but be aware that there may be clusters of high nematode populations within a field that may not be picked up when a larger area is included in the sample.
OMAFRA is working with the University of Guelph on a field tomato nematode research project starting in 2015. One component of the project is to look at which nematodes are present in Ontario tomato fields that may be causing economic damage and how do populations change over time? We are looking for grower cooperators in the Essex, Kent, and Norfolk county areas. Contact Janice LeBoeuf (OMAFRA vegetable specialist), 519-674-1699, firstname.lastname@example.org or Cheryl Trueman (University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus), 519-674-1500 x63646, email@example.com for more information. Find a brief project description here.